ITIL® and Me

In the trenches with ITIL and ITSM.

So another conference has come and gone.  As in the past, I can’t help but create a post conference wrap-up of lessons learned.  Unfortunately, this one will be a bit different as it’s now from the perspective of someone that has joined the Dark Side.  And yes, not only does the Dark Side have cookies but also you get to wear a cool costume that includes a black mask and cape.  I’m still not sure why some old guy that looks like the (former) pope wanted me to wear it.  Anyway, on to the list…

  1. Life is hard as a vendor:  I always suspected this was the case (as I would always thank vendors for their sponsorship), but now that I went through the gauntlet of manning a booth, I can confirm that yes, it’s exhausting.  Not only is there physical exhaustion of standing for hours on end, there’s the emotional toll of FOMO that comes from missing some very interesting and fantastic content (which seemed to make the requirement to “man” the booth during specific hours as being pointless since no one was around anyway).  And also, let me recap my personality trait; I’m not an outgoing, jolly-go-lucky extrovert of a salesman.  Please don’t get me wrong – I can talk with the best of the neurotic Jews out there and I had a great time making conversation with many attendees, but it is tiring.  Once again, my hats off to the exhibitors (including me).
  2. Don’t ignore the obvious signs of a failing business model:  This doesn’t necessarily have a direct connection to the conference, but I couldn’t resist pointing out an “I was right moment.”  A particular vendor I humorously made fun of during my Post Pink Post for handing out CD’s wasn’t here at Pink 13.  I’m not sure what happened, but my guess is if you have marketing techniques reminiscent of IT organizations from the 90′s, then you probably don’t belong in this decade.
  3. Make sure you network vertically, horizontally and diagonally:  I was making idle chitchat with an attendee and I brought-up the topic of having fun in Vegas (it’s an obvious conversation piece).  The attendee commented that they didn’t have anyone to accompany them on any nightly Vegas activities and that things were pretty boring.  I’ll admit, I could of easily extended an invitation (and I should have), but I didn’t.  On the other hand, they could have as well.  My point is that while attending conferences with a coworker can make the ad-hoc post-conference activities fun, it can also force you to miss out on opportunities to network with other vertical levels, a.k.a., the vendors and speakers.  I’ve been fortunate to meet and socialize with some great people at all levels; attendee, exhibitor and speaker, and I can tell you I’m always able to find some kind of social activity that goes into the morning hours, along with getting to personally know the great minds of ITSM during such activities.  Besides, vendors will often pay for the drinks, especially if you’re a customer.
  4. Don’t upgrade your phone’s software before the conference:  I screwed-up and upgraded my iPhone to 6.1.1 this past Sunday.  Wouldn’t you know it, partway through the conference my battery started draining at an alarmingly fast rate and I became “plug bound.”  As a tip, plan a blackout period for changes to your mobile devices for at least a week before the conference and don’t touch anything during the event.  Your battery will thank you and you’ll have an easier time texting, tweeting, Facebooking, LinkedInning, blogging and generally communicating during the few days when mobility matters.
  5. Jedi Mind Tricks do not work:  Either that, or most of the attendees are strong-minded and can resist my powers of the Dark Side.  Needless to say, I did try on multiple times.  If you are reading this post and can recall a slight memory of a compulsion to visit me during the conference, please let me know…I love ego boosts.
  6. What happens in Vegas stays in Vegas…until people remind you about it at the next conference:  I think this is self-explanatory, and it’s not always good.  Funny, yes.  Good, no.
  7. The best content does not always draw the best crowds:  I was a bit disappointed to experience this first-hand, and I can’t quite explain it.  I was sitting in Mark Kawasaki’s presentation (http://www.twitter.com/windupbird) and was fascinated by his experience with unplugging for 6 months and really living in his environment at Emory.  At the same time, I couldn’t believe the room wasn’t packed.  I’m not sure if the content went outside of the normal, conservative pattern of ITSM practitioners, or maybe not everyone knew of the significance.  Either way, it was awesome and I think a lot of people missed out.
  8. My archetype is that of the Royal Guard:  My primary trigger is Mystique and my secondary trigger is Prestige.  I am disappointed there was no personality type of the Rebel Smart-Ass.  I’d really be interested of how close I could get to that personality description.
  9. Irish folk dancers do not have facial muscles:  While they sure move their feet pretty damn fast, I did not see one facial twitch that indicated neurological activity.
  10. Just when I think I have a cool technology prediction that Chris Dancy (http://www.twitter.com/servicesphere) hasn’t considered, he still manages to top it:  Another self-explanatory item.

 

There you have it, a wrap-up on what I learned while representing the Dark Side at Pink 13.  Did I have fun?  Absolutely (it’s Vegas after all).  Did I learn many new things in ITSM…that’s still open to debate.  While interacting with colleagues in ITSM is the best part of conference, the content I saw was interesting, and some even fascinating (I’m heavily using the word “fascinate” since it was part of a keynote).  As I couldn’t see as much as I wanted, I can’t quite criticize the content as I used to in past blog posts.  Who knows, one day I may even be a speaker at an up and coming conference, and then you’ll know for sure I’ve mastered the art of the Jedi mind-trick.  Until then, you don’t need to see any identification, this is not the ITSM you’re looking for…

Share

I usually like to keep my “end of the year” posts very simple.  I think my entry last year had a theme that went “so long 2011; don’t let the door hit you on the way out,” and if I weren’t lazy I’d go back to read it for certainty.  Fortunately, I’m going to keep with consistency and continue my mantra of not reveling in the past.  So here goes….

 

See ya 2012!

Hasta la vista!

Auf Wiedersehen!

להיתראות!

So long, and thanks for all the fish!

 

Now that the goodbyes have been said, here are a few things I’m looking forward to in 2013:

1.  Getting back into the ITSM “game:”  I’ll admit it.  After a shooting star launch with gamification in 2012, followed by a slow fiery crash into oblivion near the end of the year, I’m ready to get back into the ITSM contributors circle.

2.  Pushing mobility:  I’ll be honest, I haven’t been very impressed with the mobile offerings out there in the ITSM technology space.  MyIT by BMC looks promising, and I keep hearing about a native iPad app for ServiceNow (which is coming when?!?), but I’m still waiting for my Chanukah gift list to be satisfied.

3.  Honing my ITSM skills:  This one may seem more like an internally focused goal, but I’m selfish so I don’t care.  I’ve recently joined the “Dark Side” of IT (a.k.a. vendors).  While I’m ecstatic to be working with some very brilliant people, I’m also taking an opportunity to learn as much as I can in this IT niche we call ITSM.

4.  More Chuck Norris Posts:  Do I need to explain this one?

5.  Being awesome:  I personally think I was pretty awesome in 2012, but I definitely am going to push the bar of awesomeness to a whole new level in 2013.  I bet you’re sitting on the edge of your seat, just wondering what I’m going to do.  Since I’m horrible at planning, I’ll let you know just as soon as I know…

There you have it.  Another “good bye blank year” post, published out for my 2 or 3 faithful followers to read.  As I’ve written in the past (I finally did reread my 2011 post), adding another number to the year really won’t change much in my IT life.  So bring it on 2013, it’s go time…

 

(If you haven’t figured it out already, I’m a fan of Douglas Adams)
Share

Being a person that works with technology in the 21st century, I just can’t help but draw parallels of my everyday experiences to today’s technological fads. This past Saturday, I was sitting in synagogue and happily enjoying my “unplugged” time (I try to practice the Sabbath Manifesto, even though I’m not always 100% successful) and I couldn’t help but keep my mind wondering to the content in the bible. Yes, “The” bible (to be specific, the Hebrew version). I was thinking about some of the past parshah’s and I couldn’t help but draw some parallels between the thousands of years of content compared to Facebook. Yes, Facebook. Then it really occurred to me, Facebook is nothing more then a 21st century version of the bible, except without stone chiselings and mass exodus movements. If you think I’m stretching the connection between these two mass content mediums, please let me show some of the comparison’s I came up while desperately fighting sleep on that Saturday (note to my Rabbi: In case you’re reading this, I really liked your sermon; just as a father of a toddler and a baby, sitting down automatically triggers my sleep deprivation recovery mode).

1. Geolocation: Both contain references to historical location information. While Facebook is very specific and displays a map, the bible still contains references and location history. If the Jewish patriarchs had access to GPS do you think they would have included coordinates in the scriptures? Absolutely. It’s not their fault rocket scientists were a bit behind in deploying the GPS satellite system.

2. Timelines: Facebook released a very interesting feature in which everybody now has their information displayed in their timeline. While I get a kick out of seeing my activity represented in a temporal display, this type of data organization is not new. Read just a few passages in Genesis and you’ll see the history laid out as a timeline, with who did what and when. Ok, it may not be incredibly historically accurate, but once again they didn’t have atomic clocks back then.

3. Likes: On Facebook, when a person comes across content they like, they have the option to “like” it (I’m still waiting for the “dislike” or “meh” option – as suggested by my good friend Brian). So, while I haven’t seen a like button in any version of the bible that I’ve read, something even more important has happened in connection with Facebook likes; curation. When I look through my Facebook (or even Twitter) news feed, I’m drawn more to the content that has the most amount of likes, shares and comments. In effect, there’s a natural filter and curation that brings the most “liked” content to the surface. In the bible the same thing happened, but instead of curation it’s called canonization. Yet, over time groups of people met, looked over the existing texts and started organizing the content from the most population scriptures. If Facebook existed 2,000 years ago, I’m confident in saying that they would have been very happy to use the “like” feature to save a lot of time and headache.

4. Community: Facebook is all about community. There are countless of fan pages out there (I’m in Back2ITSM myself) that creates communities of people with common interests. The bible was no different. Like Facebook, scriptures were contributed to by members of the community, and very much like Facebook, concepts and ideas were discussed and argued. Have you ever been in a heated argument on a comment threat on Facebook? The only difference is that technology of the 21st century expedited the comments and responses. Ok, so maybe there simply wasn’t room for a “love pugs” section in the bible, but it still provided a common set of text to bind communities together, and many of those communities still exist today.

5. Interpretation: Near where I live, there’s a community kollel; a place to study the Torah and bible. On the shelves of this establishment are books and books of interpretations, and interpretations on interpretations. In essence, comments on content. Wow…comments? What else has comments? That’s right…Facebook. In fact, Facebook has a fantastic system in which people can comment on comments. As I mentioned in item #4, comments can also be a great source for heated arguments. The same holds true for other social media sites such as Twitter (except at 140 characters, it’s hard to have a very intelligent and heated debate – I’m not smart enough to achieve my point in a limited character set). If such a wonderful technology such as Facebook existed 2,000 years ago, you can bet your boots Moses would have come down from the mountain with a laptop and Facebook login and not two tablets he had to chisel out of stone (consequently, I think it would have taken less than 40 days and 40 nights to do the job – such a change in technology has really improved efficiency).

There you have it, a few comparison’s between 21st century modern technology and a 2,000 year old (and older) historical content management system. I’m sure you can find even more parallels, and I’m even more confident you can find differences between both. Just keep in mind, who is credited with starting Facebook? Mark Zuckerberg, who also happens to be Jewish, same as Moses who wandered down the mountain carrying the Torah. Coincidence? I’ll let you decide.

Share

Last week I had the very fortunate opportunity to attend a ServiceNow user group meeting in Cleveland (yes, the mistake by the lake).  The meeting wasn’t very huge, but I had the chance to see a lot of cool technology thanks to the host.  On top of the great event, it was also hosted in a historical room with wood from the actual Sherwood Forest (how cool is that…just be thankful I didn’t break out into my “Men in Tights” song and dance).

Going back to the technology, I admit I was pretty wowed…at first.  The presentations displayed showed a lot of Twilio integration which, when coupled with ServiceNow’s workflow, provided a very simple and powerful platform for technology integration.  In the demo that I saw, someone made a call into an automated call system, and at the same time the call flow showed in a live ServiceNow instance.  Eventually the incident was marked as complete and the presenter showed how ServiceNow could leverage Twilio to make an outbound call to provide an automated phone survey.  All of this was shown as live through the workflow display provided by ServiceNow.  In short, it was very cool….for about two minutes.

And I apologize for making it sound like I’m knocking any of the work completed by that gracious presenter.  When it comes to excitement, I admit I can be difficult to impress (to this day my wife gives me grief for standing in front of the Western Wall in Jerusalem and stating “ehh…it’s ok”).  The other point of view I’d like to provide is that of a realist; the person that’s been in the trenches and has seen really cool technology come and go, and has been equally disappointed in the lack of adoption.  Tablet computing, mobility, IP telephony integration…all really neat technology that has made it into our IT lives, but yet, is not 100% mainstream in solving all of our problems.

And why is that?  Because when a new technology comes out, “the business” still wants to know the “whys” and the “hows” of its use.  In short, where is the value gained from using said technology?  This is why the title of my post includes “But Process Enables.”  I’ll also be one of the first (which I’m sure I’m not) to state that process is boring.  In fact, sometimes it’s horrendously boring.  And if the ITIL books are any indication how boring they are, try to give one of them a read and tell me how far you make it.  Enough of the flack against process and ITIL though, it’s still necessary in IT.  I’d even be so bold as to say it’s the foundation of any solid IT structure.  Products, a.k.a. technology, may automate work and provide a way to work through the processes, but having a process map to guide its use means a better value can be achieved.

Is this post trying to blow out technology’s candle to make the process one glow brighter?  Maybe.  But I also just want to convey a little bit of caution.  As really cool as technology is, and believe me, I love it just as much as the next nerd out there, I just want to give a bit of caution as to its use.  Know what you’re going to do with the products before spending hundreds, thousands, or even millions on really impressive technology that doesn’t provide any value.

Share

Switch to our mobile site